If there is no similar case, the court will determine whether there is a duty of care by applying the three normative criteria set out by the House of Lords in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman. The criteria are: what do you know about crimes? No, not those sticky cakes from the pastry, but „wrong“ from Latin, which means twisted or fake. A delicate act is a civil injustice. You may know it by another name, „negligence.“ Simply put, an unlawful act is an injustice based on a breach of the duty of care. The offence gives a person a civil right to compensation, i.e. compensation. According to the Common Law, in the case of landowners, the level of their duty of care in relation to those who moved around their premises varied depending on whether a person was considered an intruder, a licensee or a guest. This rule was eventually abolished in some common law jurisdictions. For example, in 1957, England passed the Occupiers Liability Act. The same was true in 1968 in Rowland v. Christian, the California Supreme Court replaced the old classifications with a general duty of care to all people in their own country, regardless of their status.
Following several highly publiced and controversial cases, the California legislature passed a law in 1985 partially restoring the immunity of landowners from certain types of claims filed by intruders.  You should also add a clear list of the fees for managing your property.